Well, to be fair, bundles are a big contributor to my Steam library, and they greatly depress the average per-game price paid, but I have hundreds bought through Steam itself. I think I only paid the full price on a single AAA game, though. (And even then it was only because it was a recently released game that sounded very similar to a game I had been working on at the time, and I felt obligated to check it out immediately.) I have a whole lot of AAA games, but not brand-new ones. When my Steam backlog got too high (which happened almost instantly), I quickly realized how foolish it was to pay $50 for games when they’d be marked down to $5 or less by the time I actually got around to playing them, something which happens very quickly now.
Ballotpedia’s description of the seat (California-50) has it estimated as R+11 (11% more republican than the nation as a whole). This means that it’s probably safe, but could be flipped if you have the combination of a big swing to the Democrats, plus some additional fall-out from this scandal.
How much does a scandal hurt a candidate. Well, 538 just did an article on this:
Sorry to be overly wordy here but attached is the list my friend provided me with. Please note that my friend will pay $20.00 for any factual errors that can be found. This list does not include the current crop of convictions, however.
Yeah, but it’s barely on sale.
After saying that, I looked at Steam at the most expensive games/bundles, and several publishers had 50+ game bundles on sale, and the two most expensive ones were, together, a bit more than $1500, so… It’s not impossible to spend that much money, it just involves buying more games (or add-ons) than you can play or buying the most expensive games at full price (at a rate faster than you could play through them).