I’m sure it should not be. But I am not a publisher, so I can do nothing.
Or being added to the list of people who are disappointed.
I’ll continue reading this topic to the end before asking for this. And maybe re-read that sponsored post.
But after my first impression, I could well be disappoint.
ETA: ok, I read this topic to the end. And I looked at the preprintedpaper, and the comments.
The authors are all employed by Pathway Rx, a cannabis therapy research company, and Swysh Inc, a cannabinoid-based research company.
Also, everyone, have a look here:
https://www.immunology.ox.ac.uk/covid-19/covid-19-immunology-literature-reviews/in-search-of-preventative-strategies-novel-anti-inflammatory-high-cbd-cannabis-sativa-extracts-modulate-ace2-expression-in-covid-19-gateway-tissues
Importantly,
Appropriate statistics: No.
and
translatability is questionable.
and
Main limitations: Limited n number. Quantification not robust. Stats from n=2? Unclear HPLC analysis of C. sativa extracts and poor characterisation of the ratio between the various components of the plant extract. No ladder on western blot. ECL quantification difficult as GAPDH control is not clear.
Seriously, this is marketing, nothing more and nothing less, and it is marketing on the back of a pandemic.
This is marked as sponsored post. This has a name underneath. I am considering of taking my anger there, but I am, in fact, disappointed that BB ran this.
I know it is a hard life running BB and Ken and others are often going through greater lengths to explain the difficulty of the situation, running a site on ads. And why crowdfunding is not a realistic option.
I also appreciate that this piece is identifiable as sponsored content. I even appreciate the direction it is headed: yes, there is a need for research in cannabis products.
But the ethics of exploiting a pandemic, with more than 500k deaths and many more to come to push for this, using pseudo-science is clear.
#You don’t do that.
And personally, I would not have published this on my site. However, this is not my site. I could just leave, or ignore it. I chose to point it out here and I am now reclusing (with an L) from further discussion of this particular item.
I of course value the site and the community too much to leave because of this. More importantly, I am much inclined to believe this might not bring anyone who isn’t already putting themselves at risk by consuming Cannabis products (especially smoking!) to try cannabis out as a mean of preventing Covid-19. But, just for the record,