Itβs quite simple. They are making an inquiry β or βinquisitionβ, if you will β into certain books which contain heretical unacceptable content. And when those books are found guilty, there will be a public act of violence which proves faith in the Proper Way of things, which one might be minded to call an Auto-da-fΓ©.
Whatβs Russia ever done forβ¦oh right.
No need for the Hollywood version, there is plenty of actual newsreel footage.
Of course the real thing was much less choreographed and had more of an angry mob feel.
Something tells me that they arenβt there to complain about the lunch menu on pizza wednesday
Meal Team Six in action.
Fucking assholes. That thuggish intimidation is especially sickening to see in a school setting.
Defense moved for dismissal with prejudice. Could see this particular asshole granting said motion. That would be the end as I understand it.
they are going to be so surprised when they learn how poorly e-book versions burn. and especially i guess that βamazon fireβ and βkindleβ refer to reading books not burning them.
( off topic, but who decided βamazon fireβ is supposed to be a good term. lol )
Server farm bonfire?
damnit xkcd.
agreed. and i know itβs trivial, but hats inside?
i donβt know what i would do if i were there. i hate bullies and am never sure how to deal with them.
i heard this on the radio but no context. what were the defense and the judge so upset about? ( other than criminally prosecuting a βnice young white manβ i mean )
Apparently the prosecutor questioned him in an area the judge had declared out of bounds. Considering the obvious prejudice of the judge (βcannot refer to the dead as victimsβ for instance) that could be anything, pretty much.
Think of their yellow and black shirts as being very light or very dark brown.
I think the questions involved were things like βDo you consider protecting someone elseβs private property to be self-defense?β
That guy is deathly afraid of paper cuts.
Die Hard is not just a Christmas movie
Sooooo⦠Russia has kompromat on him too?
Honestly, I donβt think heβs got that much integrity.
Heβs a Sophist in the original sense of the word: he will argue with all his power whatever he is paid to argue.
Their what now?