The US is at an increased risk of domestic terror attacks by rightwing “lone wolf” actors, experts have warned, as inflammatory Republican rhetoric [continues.] The number of attacks by adherents to rightwing ideology has soared since 2016, as Republican lies about election interference, and escalating rhetoric from the right about minority groups, have served to “provide mechanisms” for individuals to become radicalized, an analyst said.
So… it’s not related to any organized group, while it is caused by the GQP, which doesn’t count?! The quoted bit is the first two sentences. The headline should include that it’s Republican “lone” wolves.
Before postulating that politics makes for strange bedfellows, I will hazard this guess: they somehow need their arrangements (financial, political, grift-ical, etc.) a specific and stable way. It (whatever that means) was working for them for two years.
Things have changed now.
What will happen next?
The proverbial ball is in play…
I have no idea how they run their marriage.
I don’t care.
It’s not my business in any case.
But.
I can only see how much damage the Paxtons (Mr. and Mrs.) have done to Texas. Any bit, a little bit, is still too damn much.
And boy-howdy have they been busy, the pair of 'em.
It is as you said earlier (here? another thread?): too much real urgent legal business that needs to serve the people of Texas has been intentionally neglected during Ken Paxton’s time in office.
Because she didn’t have a skirt, the girl was told she would have to walk in her underwear under her graduation gown. She too opted out of her graduation.
So bizarre that underwear is more acceptable than pants. Could L.B. have opted to go with skivvies under her gown? Or was this more of a last-minute knee-jerk bad decision?
However, minutes before the ceremony was due to start without the trans girl, a cis girl at the school who was wearing pants under her graduation gown was singled out by school officials and ordered to take off her clothes. Because she didn’t have a skirt, the girl was told she would have to walk in her underwear under her graduation gown. She too opted out of her graduation.
But drag shows are grooming kids? Mention of LGBTQ+ in class is grooming kids? Meanwhile, ordering a teenager to strip for a bunch of middle-aged men is “guarding the morals of minors?” I know it’s been said, but it needs repeating as often as possible. It is never about the trans, gay, Back, whatever. It is about controlling the other. Whatever the other might be. Anyone who is outside of the straight, white, conservative male archetype. It is about power.
Straight white conservative males are of course given the privilege of controlling themselves. If they ever deviate too much from expectations, the fascists will get to them eventually.
It should be enough to see how much they are hurting trans people, but even assholes too selfish to care should be able to figure out everyone is on the list somewhere.
I said somewhere else (they run together in my age-addled brain) that even a man of all the privileges such as myself will be on the bullseye eventually, unless we surrender all moral and ethical decision making to the “Dear Leaders.” It is unavoidable, unless we stomp these roaches out in their entirety. (With all due apologies to actual roaches.)