Man in bulletproof vest and carrying "tactical" rifle arrested in WalMart

I mean, not really. You don’t really have to question it, as I’d say the definitive answer is right there - in the negative.

Well, it ain’t funny. Best case scenario, someone is carrying around a gun like this because they’re hoping to inspire panic, fear, anxiety and/or assert their own power. That’s problematic. Living in a society where you live in constant fear of gun violence is problematic. Having to sit there and watch someone who might be a mass shooter, waiting for the instant when they suddenly start killing everyone around them, legally unable to do anything until that moment (at which point you might be dead), that’s fucking intolerable.

Yep, it’s a pretty effective way of taking over public spaces. I was reading about a park where kids were playing a little league game. A guy shows up with a gun, starts waving it around, telling people they can’t do anything about it. They call the cops. The guy has a permit - he’s right, they can’t do anything about it. Their only choice was to leave.

Oh, it was deliberate - he was recording it. Probably not so much hoping he’d be detained, but of creating a mass panic (that he could legally get away with).

10 Likes

Well, Wal-Mart’s response maybe not as bad as Texas’s

9 Likes

Poor trigger control…image

4 Likes

Damned if you do…

It entirely depends on your state. In Michigan, you can carry openly in an otherwise gun-free zone (stadium, day care, etc) but only if you have a concealed carry permit. Private owners of these venues can still ban open carry as well, but publicly owned places are often barred from banning guns by another state law.

1 Like

More open carry assholes

12 Likes

there are laws against harassment and intimidation. the police just have to want to arrest white men for breaking those laws. and they really don’t want to

12 Likes

zGHQb4O

7 Likes

The same God who slept through the Holocaust, the Tasmanian Genocide, Pol Pot, and the Sixth Mass Extinction?

4 Likes

I very carefully slip away and call 911 because there’s no way that guy isn’t about to open fire on everyone.

1 Like

gary-larsen

14 Likes

And even if he isn’t, he should be treated like he is. What’s the point of carrying a big weapon like that if you don’t intend to use it? Just carrying it is a threat.

6 Likes

He was “testing” his rights… stupid fuck.

And we “the people” have the right to throw your stupid ass in jail for a long time.

13 Likes

I feel the need to test my right to free speech by shouting “Fire!” in a crowded theater.

Except if this guy was there, he might take it as a signal to start shooting.

5 Likes

Yeah, that’s the plonker. I mean, “ineffable celestial being.”

There’s nothing fire respects more than return fire.

1 Like

Sorry if I missed this in the thread but:

Best quote:

“Andreychenko’s wife allegedly told police Andreychenko was an immature boy.”

Yes, yes he is.

8 Likes

Checks out:

“This is Missouri,” the statement quotes Andreychenko as saying. “I understand if we were somewhere else like New York or California, people would freak out.”

4 Likes

I’m using wikipedia as a data source here, but I’m seeing:

  • 1980s - no drills - 42 shootings
  • 1990s - school shooting drills start after Columbine in 1999 - 65 shootings
  • 2000s - final years include kids who started drills as young children in highschool - 65 shootings
  • 2010s - all kids fully immersed in drills - 189 shootings with a few months to go

I’m not saying this proves a relationship, but my chronology is not screwed up.

8 Likes

Also, add gun control laws between now and then. I think the relationship will be much clearer.

3 Likes

I get what you’re saying. By the numbers, the shootings rise with increasing “vigilance” of the drills. I’m just going by what my kids have had going on at their schools, so this is strictly anecdotal, but they really didn’t have regular drills until Parkland.