Marjorie Taylor Greene identifies exactly which assault rifle she wants elementary students to carry

“and your homework for tonight is…” (pew pew pew)

“Not anymore!”

7 Likes

today i learned that JESUS is why we have America. and i guess he didn’t want to have much to do with it once he gave it to us.

12 Likes

He did leave Chicago.

6 Likes

JESUS: America’s deadbeat dad?

7 Likes

I’m sure that lot believes that everything they like about America (white supremacy, Christian supremacy, etc) had god’s hand in it, but everything that they can’t justify (slavery, genocide) was not.

And he built hotrods…

9 Likes

(That’s some great morning drive time music right there!)

5 Likes

Angry, loud, aggressive, fast tempo? Yep… checks out.

5 Likes

Oh come on. Adolescents sport AK’s in Syria, Uganda and El Salvador. Just look at the photos upthread. /s :slight_smile:

You suppose MTG gets a kickback on each gun sold?

2 Likes

.22LR, not 5.56 or .223 Remington. Lower velocity, blunt nosed round - good.
Proprietary lower capacity magazines - good.
The safety knob on the right-hand side of the rifle, pill-bottle-style, needs to be pulled out with some force and rotated into the locked position before the rifle can fire. This puts the adult in control of the gun’s safety function - good.
Ergonometrically sized down for smaller users - good.
Overall, not a bad idea, so long as the child is supervised.

Which assault weapon does she recommend people carry outside her home when protesting her?

10 Likes

Do you think that, in an active shooter type situation, the teacher might be a little too distracted to properly supervise a classroom full of elementary students armed with semi-automatic weapons?

10 Likes

3 Likes

I think teachers have enough to do, e.g., teach students not to engage in emotionally driven hyperbole. Supervision is a parental role.

1 Like

You are the one who brought up the need for the children to be supervised. Are you saying their use of firearms in school does not need to be supervised?

11 Likes

if it ever gets to the point where it matters what kind of bullets the children have been shooting, then things will definitely not be “good”

13 Likes

Um…at school? As in, where parents take their kids most days of the year so their kids can receive an education while supervised by education professionals?

10 Likes

.22LR, favorite of mob hit men and government assassins, capable of tearing through a child’s body and causing fatal or life-altering wounds - not good.

Proprietary lower capacity magazines, killing fewer children per minute - :person_shrugging:

Relying on a safety and underestimating the strength and determination of children, and ignoring that children grow into teenagers - not good.

Sized down so that younger users can aim more accurately, more concealable - not good.

Parental supervision to familiarize children with the idea of shooting at human beings (but only bad ones) - not good.

Promoting the idea that the solution to the gun problem is more guns - bad.

12 Likes

Oh, there definitely must be a rangemaster to provide supervision, as well as locking the arms into the armory when not on the range.

So, these locked away weapons could be of no possible use in a school shooter situation?

10 Likes