Marx's birthplace celebrates his bicentennial with Communist traffic-lights

Do you realize that what you’ve effectively just said is “communism can’t work because nobody’s actually tried it?”

I assume that you mean to say that indicates that it’s impossible, but that’s a claim that you have very little evidence for. Regimes born out of violence tend to eventually resort to barbarism when their power is threatened, that’s got nothing at all to do with capitalism or socialism. Case in point: pretty much all of Latin America. Every time a country in Latin America started flirting with the idea of socialist policies, you end up with, primarily the US, coming in and pulling an Iran-Contra styled operation that either puts the new regime in a position where people panic and resort to authoritarianism or they succeed in replacing it with what are effectively bandits. You don’t have a lot of success stories because some wealthy capitalists see socialism as an existential threat that has to be destroyed. The entire Vietnam war, for example. That horrendous waste of life wasn’t about stopping communism as much as it was about sustaining capitalism for the very small subset of people that it actually benefits–the people who are already winning.

The point is, capitalism uses money to assess value. Not just the value of goods and services, but all value, including life and morality. There’s an overwhelming body of evidence that indicates that this results in bad outcomes for 99% of the people involved, it’s called history. Time and again, wealth siloed by the few imperils everyone, and the more things we allow them to do with that wealth, the worse the results end up being.

When people die because they can’t afford to see a doctor, a socialist sees that as a failure on the part of society to take care of itself. That’s the whole point of socialism, seeing to it that everyone’s needs are met.

The capitalist sees it as a market correction. A necessary death to preserve the wealth of someone else.

So if you want to talk about philosophy and ideology, I’m happy to. If all you’re here to do is talk about how some past regimes that were doomed from the start, or doomed thanks largely to foreign interference, we’re done.

Finally, regardless of your choice, we’re done talking about Hitler. You keep bringing him up, but it’s not really relevant to the discussion and it’s increasing my already growing suspicion that you’re one of the rancorous folks who have been coming around and intentionally causing conflict. BB leans pretty far left, so if you can’t leave well enough alone, perhaps it’s not the community for you. I’ve got my suspicions about your buddy Loudoun_Hillbilly as well.

4 Likes

Imaginary infomercial clickbait from Buzzfeed

Has the world got you down? Proletariat and bourgeoisie not getting along?

Is your Pug paying fealty to Hitler with the Bellamy salute? (note: Bellamy salute not related to Bellingham, Washington)

nazi_dog_3

Then cheer up! Controversial Scottish comedians (that’s him above) have made certain that the pugnacious breed is actually a </cough/> “false-flag operation” </cough/>.

That dog is Marx’s bitch now! (False communist party flag not included)

Buy the stock photo of the spokes-model for only $19.99 today!~~

Marx was promoted to traffic cop, and is being crucified like our Lord and Savior … (arms outstretched in classic sacrificial pose)

https://www.postradar.net/post/German-city-installs-Karl-Marx-traffic-lights/?id=262042

While somewhere in the recent past, Gloucester city council found room in their tiny hearts for Garden-gnome Karl ™ …

And over in China, everyone appears befuddled by bureaucratic performance art … (promotional courtesy of a UK traffic signal company)

http://www.fisherandcompany.co.uk/the-most-confusing-traffic-lights/

As Buddha wears his own heart “on his robe” and tells us how he really feels…

And we discover that just like some tattoos, fashion statements really can go out of style!


(Photo-credit for the ever-popular fashion statements of the early 1900s: http://themindcircle.com/swastika-before-wwii/)

OY VEY! (Pugs and gay Hitlers optional. “Tramp-stamps” may incur tariff charge …)


(Photo-credit to our unfortunate reality: http://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/192439/dont-forget-to-laugh)

I would refer you to Anarchist Catalonia or the Free Territories of Ukraine.

1 Like

Oh yeah?

No unicorn has ever been horned in practice.

White Western capitalism is built upon a foundation of slavery and colonialism, and that history still shapes the present. The global south is not impoverished and wartorn because non-white people are innately stupid or warlike; it is as it is due to half a millenia’s worth of European exploitation.

Although the global south managed to fight off the most overt expressions of colonialism during the 20th century, the effects of empire are still very much a part of the present.

The economies of America, Australia and Europe are, to this day, fundamentally reliant upon the exploitation of the non-white world. Western trade policies and foreign policies serve to maintain this situation.

5 Likes

I can agree that colonialism sapped a ton of resources from various places and it’s effects are still felt today in many places. Haiti is a good example, as the French first depleted the soil with their farming techniques, and then the rest of the land was razed for base resources after the revolution and it today is a stark contrast to the other half of the island in the Dominican Republic.

However I am not sure it is fair today to attribute all the problems just to “colonialism” and certainly not capitalism. I mean, we are talking very broad terms, which is impossible to encompass every area. I can agree that certainly some areas are harder hit and still feeling the effects. But at the same time, the continued instability in some areas is due to local issues and infighting. Yes, I can agree the past effects the present and is a factor, but when laying “blame” I don’t think it is fair to blame any one factor.

And conversely, there are former colonial areas doing very well, and many have recovered in part or in whole. Places in Asia that were literally jungles 60 years ago are now economic powerhouses. Which goes into my next point…

I can agree some of the trade and foreign policies are bullshit. Protectionism rarely works out they way you think it will (look at Venezuela). Though I have to look at the growth of manufacturing in Asia (which I assume is what you are referring to with the exploitation comment) and you can’t deny their poverty rates have dropped, China actually has a burgeoning middle class and a whole that sleeping dragon is waking (Australia also has pretty tight ties with China and has been working to ally even closer). Korea isn’t just a hub of manufacturing but of innovation, with things like their LCD screens becoming world leaders. Asia is now investing into places in Africa, and already you can see some countries are starting to blossom.

So, in summary, I think it is disingenuous and over generalizing to characterize capitalism like it is still mainly about colonization and slavery, just as it is disingenuous and over generalizing to characterize socialism as communism, and communism as Soviet communism. And, again, I will recognize the points that both slavery and colonialism were used and exploited by capitalist in the past, and there is still exploitation going on today. I am acknowledge that capitalism requires rules and regulations, other wise there is too much room for abuse and a miss match of power. I also acknowledge probably the best system has elements of capitalism and socialism.

Do you know why Haiti was so desperate for resources to export after the revolution?

They needed the money in order to pay off the French, who threatened to reinvade and reenslave them if they weren’t compensated for their lost property (i.e.: slaves).

That “debt” crippled the Haitian economy, and wasn’t paid off until 1947.

The French threat also drove the Haitian government to borrow heavily from American banks…which in turn motivated American banks to demand the US invasion of Haiti in 1915.

That occupation lasted until 1934, and rapidly accelerated the American extraction of Haiti’s resources. This was the war that made Smedley Butler realise that he wasn’t fighting to defend anything except corrupt capitalism.

This is a bit long, but worthwhile:

https://www.alternet.org/world/how-america-and-rest-world-ruined-haiti

Colonialism and capitalism are related. While it is theoretically possible to have one without the other, that isn’t how it played out in this world. And colonialism is not just a feature of history:

No, not just Asian labour. African minerals, Middle Eastern oil, etc etc. The electronics you’re using to read this are almost certainly made with coltan from the Congo.

I don’t disagree with you on that, BTW. Despite appearances, I’m not a hardcore communist; I’m more of a “whatever works” DemSoc kinda guy.

But the present system very clearly does not work for the overwhelming majority of people on this planet.

2 Likes

This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.