Originally published at: https://boingboing.net/2019/01/28/no-one-stopped-this-museum-vis.html
…
Curator cosplay never pays.
Its not up to the museum patrons to intervene. There’s a distinct possibility the painting could’ve been damaged or an innocent party could’ve been hurt if things escalated. After all museums are supposed to have security so i would say that their staff failed to intervene, not the museum goers.
A true lover of art.
No one stopped a Russian from taking Crimea? How odd!
Crimea doesn’t pay
Crimea river
I thought the whole bystander effect thing was discredited? Like, it turns out a few people did in fact try to help Kitty Genovese, and it was really just a couple misguided men that turned a blind eye? Or is there another form of it?
In any case, I’m not sure I’d step in if I was at a museum and someone brazenly took something off the wall, and no alarms sounded. And even if some alarm did go off, I’d probably just stick around so I could describe the guy to security. Not gonna risk my health over a piece of art.
Ocean’s One
Who knows what’s in his pockets.
I value my life more than a one million dollar painting finding its way back to a museum, and apparently those people did too.
It would have been easier and more fun if he’d wheeled in another painting from some nobody and put that up in its place. That and a clipboard, piece of cake!
Haha! The Clipboard Effect!
If the guy looked like he knew what he was doing, had a “I belong here” attitude and a serious face, it’s amazing what a criminal can get away with.
For all anyone knew, he was removing it for cleaning!
In the Maiden Heist, Christopher Walken’s character dreams of fighting off a gang of art thieves.
that’s exactly what i would think if i saw this happening, too.
EDIT: this also works in reverse – like with guerilla artists putting their artwork IN museums.
You gotta start somewhere.
Art installation Removal.
That sounds a little like this story.
In Soviet Russia, Art is moved by you.
Yep, not my job. I’m not putting myself in possible danger and taking on the liability of damaging the painting when they actually pay people to do that.
Tagging this bystander effect seems erroneous. I suspect the decision to not intervene had less to do with each other not intervening and more to do with assuming he worked there, as I would have. After all, as noted above, the patrons aren’t responsible for the gallery’s security and it would be awkward to stop someone only to discover they did work there.