Says that you must be no fun at parties if you don’t find that funny.
3 Likes
Swoops in to defend the potential comedy value of any situation, no matter how horrific, and to darkly hint that suggesting otherwise comprises an endorsement of punishing thoughtcrime.
3 Likes
Points out that he has friends who are members of the group mocked in that joke, who assure him that the joke is harmless and funny.
A less polite and fully pointed attack on your character, verging into irrational rage.
1 Like
A statement about your mom
1 Like
a hastily removed comment that few saw and no one understood.
4 Likes
[ Several missing comments ]
Quote of hastily removed content, followed by, “Yeah!”
1 Like
The hanging remnants of lost conversations.
Anyang!
The scent of a flower you have not found
4 Likes
A bleary realization that the wheels may have fallen off.
Admission that it was funny, sheepishly.
Buckethead and Claypool
1 Like
Eye-rolling snap about how we all know what the chicken reference means, followed by an unintelligible explanation of what the chicken reference means.
3 Likes
Points out ad hominem attack, its desperate nature, its Latin nature, whether or not the aggressor is sufficiently lacking in ignorance to recognise that, thus its position-bolstering nature, thus obviously score 1 to the home team
Finishes with an ironically intended rollout of “alea jucta est”, although unaware of meaning, but adequately lacking in ignorance to be aware that some of the Asterix books have a pirate character who says it after their ship sinks again. Believes this will work in all sorts of ways to weaken the spirit of the naysayers
1 Like
A good comment can
make topics fun but no less
Controversial
1 Like
Futile attempt at bringing the conversation back to original controversial subject.
And a jab at [quote=“timquinn, post:133, topic:13898, full:true”]
Admission that it was funny, sheepishly.
[/quote]
for flip-flopping.
1 Like
mistakenly hysterically amusing declaration of “IANAL” pursued by treatise on the obvious fact that the topic has now changed substantially, and prima facie all correspondents are in agreement as there are no complaints and lots of contributions to the new thread, and opposing the creation of a new thread as this topic is like an evolutionary branch that can only be attained by first passing through the original topic.
Also advice that accusations of flip-flopping are ad hominem attacks which under the forum rules is bad form
1 Like
Snide comment about a run-on sentence.
Claim that I’m well aware of the forum rules, despite the fact that I’ve never read them.
2 Likes
