Opinion Piece on Controversial Subject

Triumphant trumpeting about awareness and knowledge being distinct, thus proving either lack of understanding, and hence capability to understand, or lies, thus untrustworthy

4 Likes

Baseless accusation that you’re clearly devoid of both awareness and knowledge.

And you’re a jerk.

2 Likes

snarky crowing about bad losers and winners never quitting

3 Likes

Nevermind.

4 Likes

Pedantically corrects spelling of alea jacta est (noting that perhaps it should be alea iacta est, anyway). Hopes that nobody asks any follow up questions about latin since knowledge is also restricted to Asterix, Google and Wikipedia.

4 Likes

responds with hopefully educated sounding statement pointing to accent differences between Roman regions, and grumbling about pedants on fora

3 Likes

Belittles @peregrinus_bis and @daneel for using Latin phrases, because 'Merican is the only language you really need to know.

3 Likes

Laughingly points out that a “mirkin” is a loinal wig

6 Likes

Again, pedantically corrects that to merkin

2 Likes

frowns, squints, quickly squirts words, feels lost

2 Likes

Archly posts corrections to others’ assertions, then mentions they are correct because Wikipedia. Facepalms and snarkporn collide, threatening a nasty little scratch in the space-time continuum.

2 Likes

Never having encountered this phenomenon called “snarkporn,” mistakes it for something else and attempts to lighten the mood with references to squaliformes and Rule 34, eliciting eyerolls and [crickets].

3 Likes

Ad hominem attack, saying you’re dumb for not knowing what “snarkporn” means, though I actually don’t know what it means either.

Is dumb, knows it, is terrified others are beginning to find out, flags your post for abuse, asks smarter older brother to type a withering retort, receives “noogie” from brother for being a dipshit, starts a sockpuppet account but isn’t bright enough to carry laptop to neighbor’s house to get, at minimum, a different IP address, is promptly clobbered by mods, gives up in shame, never to darken BBS’s door again.

Heh. Naw, that doesn’t happen.

Doubles down on the sharkporn gag, insisting somebody else simply can’t type accuratey. Is tripped up by Muphry’s Law.

5 Likes

Changes tactics, now saying that what @AliceWeir actually meant to type was sarkporn, which features women drinking Cutty Sark scotch on the Cutty Sark, the British clipper ship.

Delivers the proles from their ignorance:

“Snarkporn often occurs when (usually) males begin to wonder about noticeably thin adopted persona of any given poster representing as female. Incident is caused by starting to imagine naked 600-lb housebound troll posing as younger, hot troll of opposite gender. Wish for second guess to be correct jacks brains, thread derails, replies cease momentarily while private reveries ensue, possibly accompanied by actual porn. Resumption of commentary invariably brings posts containing non sequitur sexual innuendo or gender-based insult as evidence snarkporn has indeed occurred.”

2 Likes

Notes that even mentions of snarkporn may be enough to induce snarkporn in some.

1 Like

Marvels that snarkporn might actually be A Thing.

1 Like

Reminds you to stay on original topic, but only because I’m angry that I was wrong.

Wonders about etymology of “snarkporn,” but accidentally Googles “entomology of snarkporn,” and ends up confused and disturbed.

Edit: meant to reply to @AliceWeir

3 Likes

Over-excited at new turn of events, posts link site about sharks to win favour

www.sharkattacksurvivors.com

4 Likes