Triumphant trumpeting about awareness and knowledge being distinct, thus proving either lack of understanding, and hence capability to understand, or lies, thus untrustworthy
Baseless accusation that youâre clearly devoid of both awareness and knowledge.
And youâre a jerk.
snarky crowing about bad losers and winners never quitting
Nevermind.
Pedantically corrects spelling of alea jacta est (noting that perhaps it should be alea iacta est, anyway). Hopes that nobody asks any follow up questions about latin since knowledge is also restricted to Asterix, Google and Wikipedia.
responds with hopefully educated sounding statement pointing to accent differences between Roman regions, and grumbling about pedants on fora
Belittles @peregrinus_bis and @daneel for using Latin phrases, because 'Merican is the only language you really need to know.
Laughingly points out that a âmirkinâ is a loinal wig
Again, pedantically corrects that to merkin
frowns, squints, quickly squirts words, feels lost
Archly posts corrections to othersâ assertions, then mentions they are correct because Wikipedia. Facepalms and snarkporn collide, threatening a nasty little scratch in the space-time continuum.
Never having encountered this phenomenon called âsnarkporn,â mistakes it for something else and attempts to lighten the mood with references to squaliformes and Rule 34, eliciting eyerolls and [crickets].
Ad hominem attack, saying youâre dumb for not knowing what âsnarkpornâ means, though I actually donât know what it means either.
Is dumb, knows it, is terrified others are beginning to find out, flags your post for abuse, asks smarter older brother to type a withering retort, receives ânoogieâ from brother for being a dipshit, starts a sockpuppet account but isnât bright enough to carry laptop to neighborâs house to get, at minimum, a different IP address, is promptly clobbered by mods, gives up in shame, never to darken BBSâs door again.
Heh. Naw, that doesnât happen.
Doubles down on the sharkporn gag, insisting somebody else simply canât type accuratey. Is tripped up by Muphryâs Law.
Changes tactics, now saying that what @AliceWeir actually meant to type was sarkporn, which features women drinking Cutty Sark scotch on the Cutty Sark, the British clipper ship.
Delivers the proles from their ignorance:
âSnarkporn often occurs when (usually) males begin to wonder about noticeably thin adopted persona of any given poster representing as female. Incident is caused by starting to imagine naked 600-lb housebound troll posing as younger, hot troll of opposite gender. Wish for second guess to be correct jacks brains, thread derails, replies cease momentarily while private reveries ensue, possibly accompanied by actual porn. Resumption of commentary invariably brings posts containing non sequitur sexual innuendo or gender-based insult as evidence snarkporn has indeed occurred.â
Notes that even mentions of snarkporn may be enough to induce snarkporn in some.
Marvels that snarkporn might actually be A Thing.
Reminds you to stay on original topic, but only because Iâm angry that I was wrong.
Wonders about etymology of âsnarkporn,â but accidentally Googles âentomology of snarkporn,â and ends up confused and disturbed.
Edit: meant to reply to @AliceWeir
Over-excited at new turn of events, posts link site about sharks to win favour