Longer. Since about Vietnam. And that’s if we excuse genocide, slavery, and Jim Crow with a blanket ‘it was the times’ exception.
On the plus side, nations can’t be the good guys or, indeed, bad guys. They are too fractious to have moral agency so clear-cut. But they can do good or do ill. Right now you are doing ill. For the sake of us all, please stop.
Yeah. You don’t even lose “Godwin’s Law” points for pointing out that the politician giving a speech at Auschwitz after talking about how all Muslims should be hunted down and killed is not on the side of goodness and niceness.
I don’t understand how you see it as a neo-nazi pitch.
Why would a neo-Nazi sympathizer broadcast from Auschwitz unless he was also discrediting it (a la Leuchter). To not do so validates the sane, non-denialist view. He’s acknowledging gas chambers and the fact that there was the physical capacity to murder millions of people there, something neo-nazi denialists would never ever do, and so this does not appeal to neo-nazis.
He’s expressing sympathy (albeit in a grandstanding and melodramatic manner) for the victims and describes their suffering. This would not appeal to neo-Nazis.
The video closes with a US flag and an Israeli flag. This would not appeal to neo-Nazis.
His video has Schindler’s List soundtrack in the background. Referencing Speilberg’s Holocaust movie would not appeal to neo-Nazis.
This isn’t a neo-Nazi wolf whistle. Its just a straight-up appeal to fear: Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid; Inflate the Defense Budget; Build the Wall; Support the Muslim Ban; Support GOP Chickenhawks.
Mixed feelings. Sure it was a dick move, yet a GOP rep acknowledging that the Holocaust existed at all and that it mostly affected Jews feels like progress.