It’s not his fault, it was the moral failings of leaders in Washington that made him do it.
2 Likes
Do you think your point is hurt by the biases you routinely show here, Mr. Pot?
8 Likes
If I was trying to portray myself as “objective” in the way the Post does, it would be. But I don’t, and it isn’t.
The USA was probably better off when we had liberal, radical, conservative and reactionary news media in every city. You could tell by the opinion page how each lined up and interpret their reporting accordingly.
Which is why I prefer the news sources who wear their views on their sleeves. I spend about 50 percent of my time reading conservative and libertarian sites, about 40 percent reading liberal sites, and 10 percent or less reading the “mainstream”.
There’s a difference?
About as much as there is between liberals, socialists, and communists.
Personally I think of myself as one of the remaining South Park Conservatives…
Given the relative paucity of right wing evangelical southerners amongst us, that doesn’t seem to be an active outreach strategy of the mutant community.
Fake outrage at the fake fake outrage blog? Oh lord…
1 Like
Ah, so going by that model, since liberals, socialists and communists all agree that people should be treated equally and well, but disagree on the hows and methods, conservatives and libertarians all agree that people should be treated unfairly and looted for all they have, but disagree on the hows and methods?
7 Likes
I think it makes more sense to evaluate economic systems based on (1) how well they do for the overall standard of living of a society and (2) do they operate well in a non-authoritarian political model.
Real world history, not goals or ideals.
1 Like
So then why are you a Libertarian, aka “I want to have the liberty to grow rich, and you to have the liberty to starve”?
2 Likes
Going by 1930s Catalonia and current Rojava, I’d say that Libertarian Socialism is the best performing.
6 Likes
Hey, the world is a spectrum. Let’s say that Galt’s Gulch is a zero on the government scale, and Pyongyang is a ten.
Personally, I am maybe a two or a three. You might be a six or a seven. The fact that I am in favor of less government than you does not mean I am an Objectivist or an anarchist, any more than your being in favor of more government than me does not mean you are a Stalinist. OK???
No, it’s pretty clear you think anyone to the left of you is a new Stalin waiting to happen.
Every post you make, from defending pedophiles by bringing up “Your side does it too!”, defending nazis and the KKK by spouting whataboutisms about “northern” racism, complaining about “regulations” strangling corporations that just want to make an honest buck (by screwing everybody else over), and claiming universal healthcare is some communist bogeyman that will destroy society.
It’s a broken record of conservative stupidity. Like every other person I’ve met in this shithole of a state.
1 Like
OK, one at a time.
Find a post of mine that describes universal healthcare as “communist”. What I’ve done, and often, is to cite the US government’s miserable track record at projecting the costs of health care programs, and to note that first world countries with such systems fund them with heavy income taxes and VATs on the middle class.
Yes, underfunded systems work worse than funded systems. Next?
And I don’t need to itemize every ignorant post you make, it’s boring, and anybody can go read your posts from your bio if they want to have the foxnews.com experience here on BB.
3 Likes
Nicely played. I’m in awe of your eloquence!
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
