My point is that a gradual acceleration “towards” is fatally insufficient. It isn’t a “goal”, it’s an immediate necessity. And a vote for Clinton is a statement that the status quo, although flawed, is tolerable. It isn’t.
It’s 1936 and we’ve got one side claiming that Adolph is our friend, while the other is suggesting that we might, at some indefinite point in the future, consider slightly reducing the amount of arms we’re selling to Germany.
Honestly, I think we’re at least a decade past the point where it became ethically justified to physically sabotage carbon-polluting infrastructure.
