Asshole fascist enabler needs to go away.
Why do the fascists always claim the US is a laughing stock abroad because of progressive stuff?
As someone who does not live in the US, itās only a laughing stock because of the fascists, though the laughing has slowly been being replaced with deeper and deeper concern over the last decade or so.
Corollary - they always say we shouldnāt care what other countries think.
Yeah that too. But of course they do that talking out of both sides thing with everything. Whatever serves their needs in that instant. Itās amazing anyone ever falls for it.
I have personally witnessed this. My parent have some Scottish friends that used be our neighbors. They moved to England many years ago, but would come back and visit every few years. It used to be little jokes about our cultureāthe last time I saw them (several years), that tone had changed.
Yes.
If it follows previous statistics, most of those guns were sourced from Texas.
People doing $600 side hustles, and not paying taxes, will be caught. On the other hand, people doing $600M hustles via off-shore accounts, and not paying taxes, will not.
Hopefully theyāll catch some AirBnB slumlords, but so long as they pay their taxes, or can mount an expensive defense, the IRS wonāt touch them.
More squeeze on the middle class and down, without touching the real tax cheats.
Iām glad Iāve been self-reporting for the last few years.
There is no bottom.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/tucker-carlson-racist-justin-pearson_n_64376ba4e4b05765f3806154
Another compromise to keep a tiny vocal group happy. Itās sad to see that Scholasticās has no spine.
You should post that in our new war on books thread!
Just wow. That idiot not only managed to get the racist bit in, but heās laced it with a healthy dose of transphobia also, with weighted use of the word transitioning.
The below quote is from the article, blurred because itās that guy:
āYou never see politicians transitioning to say, Malcolm X. Why is that? Maybe because Malcolm X didnāt talk like a sharecropper. He spoke dignified standard English,ā
In this three-year period, Koch groups that are primarily focused on influencing American policy and politics accounted for more than 93% of the spending. Only 6% came from Koch foundations that predominantly support genuinely charitable causesāthose that do not explicitly align with Charles Kochās own economic interests or ideological policy goals.
So why is policy/political sending getting a tax break?