Agreed. Now is the time.
Aw, that just made me tear up a little.
Never give up; never surrender.
Agreed. Now is the time.
Aw, that just made me tear up a little.
Never give up; never surrender.
I never took his candidacy seriously enough to write one. The only thing I know of for sure is that he will be anti-choice, and put more anti-choice people in positions of authority.
That’s it? Really?
Why are you so unsure about his other reaffirmed promises, like getting the oil pipeline projects going, and ignoring climate change, and deporting millions of “illegals”?
Oh, right, it’s clearly because you’re on that side of the fence, and you know that saying so openly here – and that openly cheering for Trump – would make most others here take you even less seriously.
Honestly, I do not understand what the hell you are talking about.
So where’s your list of the horrors you think Trump will do?
I never took his candidacy seriously enough to write one.
So, you were “more afraid of Clinton than” of Trump, based entirely on a laundry list of maybe, possibly, “likely” things about Clinton and absolutely no research whatsoever on Trump’s verifiable promises and statements??
Wow.
On Sunday, Donald Trump announced that former executive chairman of Breitbart News and Trump campaign chairman Steve Bannon will serve as chief strategist in the incoming administration, working as “equal partners” with chief-of-staff-to-be Reince...
The only thing I know of for sure is that he will be anti-choice, and put more anti-choice people in positions of authority.
And you consider that acceptable, if not preferable, to vague concerns about “corruption”.
Doesn’t impact his life directly, so why should he care.
When you lose a baseball game, you shake the hand of your opponent and practice harder. You don’t just start smashing stuff, blocking traffic, and demanding that they change the rules.
You just don’t get it. Rally against that fucking wall he wants to build? I’m with you. Rally against cutting social security? I’m with you. Rally against rounding up illegal immigrants? I’m with you. Rally against restricting abortion? I’m with you. Rally against what ever bullshit this fuckhead will come up with? I’m with you. Rally for changing the voting system, so it will represent the popular vote better? I’m with you. But rallying against the result of an election, because people voted wrong? How? Why? Because democracy isn’t applicable if I really, really dislike the result? I don’t think so.
But rallying against the result of an election, because people voted wrong? How? Why? Because democracy isn’t applicable if I really, really dislike the result? I don’t think so.
There’s never a wrong time to take to the streets to denounce fascism.
It’s not a game. The outcome of this election will have devastating impact on a huge number of lives.
Obligs.
It’s really fucking NOT.
You just don’t get it.
Honestly, it seems like you’re the one “not getting it.”
Again, people are not rallying against the outcome; they’re rallying against a horrible, grossly unqualified person being elected not because of the actual will of the majority, but because of the fucked up way the system is currently set up.
They are rallying against all the horrible things that horrible person said he would do.
the fucked up way the system is currently set up.
“Currently” being since fucking 1824…
“Currently” being since fucking 1824…
Point being?
“Currently” being since fucking 1824…
Maybe it worked back in 1824. Since this is the second time in recent history a candidate has won the popular vote but lost in the Electoral College, I think it’s reasonable to suggest it’s not working in the present.
I totally agree, it sucks. Good luck changing it.
“Currently” being since fucking 1824…
Exactly my fucking point; it doesn’t work anymore, if it ever did.
It’s nothing compared to what was being chanted and displayed at a typical Trump rally.
So basically, you’re saying making our institutions more democratic won’t happen, but also don’t go out on the streets, unless there is a very good, singular, policy-based reason to do so.
But that was just a few bad apples… /s
White nationalist leaders are praising Donald Trump's decision to name former Breitbart executive Steve Bannon as his chief strategist, telling CNN in interviews they view Bannon as an advocate in the White House for policies they favor.