I think that’s pretty different. If Fox News calls Obama a “traitor” then I guess that’s kind of a similar thing. But Fox News also deals in flat out falsehood a really noticeable portion of the time, and you can go a certain distance past which is becomes obvious you aren’t just expressing your strong feelings but actually trying to make a point you feel others should take literally and act on literally.
If I say my current prime minister is a sociopath then I’m being annoyed and hyperbolic (possibly right, but I don’t have good evidence). If I say that a certain one of my former prime ministers should be arrested for fraud and sued for at least $2M by the government, I’m presenting what I believe to be a fact (on that does, actually, drive me nuts, but even if I’m mad about it, it’s still true).
I guess the thing about Fox is it runs 24 hours through various media channels and has a variety of programming, some of which is presented as editorial and some of which is presented as news coverage, but all of which follows a clear political narrative. So some content would be comparable but much wouldn’t, and the scale of the operation and resources behind it make it a different proposition.
of or relating to a particular subject, art, or craft, or its techniques.“technical terms”(especially of a book or article) requiring special knowledge to be understood."a technical report"synonyms:specialist, specialized, scientific; More complex, complicated, esoteric “this might seem very technical”
of, involving, or concerned with applied and industrial sciences.“an important technical achievement”
So actually, there is nothing technically correct about it. Geez, go learn what the word “technical” means, you have a duty to the truth.
