The more often I see the “illness” speculations, the more uncomfortable I get with it. I’ve seen this before, with Bush, e.g., and everyone knows about Reagan (albeit Alzheimer’s got to him long after he had done all the damage). We’ve also seen a pope with Parkinson’s.
My argument against is has three points.
- In neither of these cases an illness really explained what these and other men did, or said. I would argue they are still responsible.
- In neither of the cases, an assumed or real illness helped anyone to mitigate the results of the politics and policies implemented by those men. I would argue that also a proven illness wouldn’t make any of their actions until the proof, and probably beyond this, illegitimate.
- OTH, anyone who suffers themselves or who has family suffering from a disease which is potentially or actually affecting their mental capabilities, especially decision-making (not only, but also in the legal sense) is somewhat affected by the assumption that these men do and say what they do because of an illness.
I can easily see why the idea coming to mind so easily, and is so persuasive. I often ask myself how anyone in their right mind can do or say things I hear on the news.
But I must consider that they just see reality slightly different than I do, that they deal with it in a different way, etc., p.p.
Also, I still must consider that they might be operating on a very different set of ethics, or even logic. Which might translate to my ethics as wrong, or even inhuman; or illogical, respectively.
If you need convincing that this way of explaining malice might be just our own mental shortcut not to deal with inconvenient realities, consider this:
Now even the sitting president of the US of A suggests one former senior advisor “lost his mind”. Verbatim.
Pinging @OhhJim, @redesigned, and @wolfman_al2 for this.
Disclaimer: I have family and friends who are or were affected by Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, Schizophrenia, clinical depression, bipolar disorders and other health issues affecting their ability to make decisions. Neither of them, to my knowledge, ever did anything as remotely insane as running for president, or wreaking havoc in any field of politics, or society. They didn’t even ever harm other people. (That is, other than emotionally - try living with an early-stage Alzheimer’s patient; so much pain…)