They were probably coprolites.
In the context of an oversight hearing with direct testimony under oath from officers that communicated severe allegations of : 1) misappropriation of funds by secret programs, 2) obfuscation of congressional inquiries by various factions, 3) allegations of retaliations against whistleblowers, 4) a national security threat of our airspace by UAPs, and 5) testimony of retrieved non-human crafts and pilots;
I don’t think Congress will have the luxury to engage these allegations in bad faith and dismiss them. They will have to investigate this.
Congress does what it wants
Nobody anywhere can force it to do anything
So your point is that Congress is not literally forced to investigate the subject. Ok, sure.
… you literally have no idea what they will “investigate” and what they won’t investigate, just like the rest of us
“… ridiculous claims require ridiculous evidence”
You make a strong point here. However a career in Intel at his level pays really good. At only 36yrs old, he -had- a bright future ahead of him in the service. Out of the service, he -had- an amazing future ahead of him in private sector Defense. “Blows whistles” is not something you want on your resume in his line of work or any line of work. Now sure, there’s probably “some” money to be made on the UFO nut speaking tour circuit but I’m pretty sure it doesn’t compete with a free lifetime pass in Boeing upper management.
Well I hope Congress will investigate the first-hand witnesses that Grush said he interviewed and that he’d name in a closed hearing, investigate the Programs that he said he was denied access to, investigate the departments that denied him access during his own investigations as part of the UAP TF. So technically I guess I have some idea of what they could investigate…
It wouldn’t be a UFO discussion without that quote
I believe
Because they believe he’s talking a load of bollocks, as do I.
I’m not sure that anything other than #5 will strike Congress as especially novel. Aliens are a matter of some controversy; but I don’t think I’ve ever encountered someone who thought that black budgets are models of transparency, or that the murkier corners of the ‘intelligence community’ were receptive to outside inquiries, even theoretically authorized ones.
People do stupid things all the time in the name of woo. There’s no accounting for it. Citing all that he’s giving up is not evidence of his credibility.
My first thoughts were,
“Non-human? Dolphins are inhuman and can conceivably develop impressive technologies. Were these alleged “crashed spacecraft” found on land or in the ocean? How do we know any seaborne detritus isn’t the product of dolphin engineers’ efforts at airborne craft?”
“That’s why we like you, Mulder, your ideas are weirder than ours."
so you are saying this House subcommittee is talking shit.