Yes. After WW2 the attitudes of some British people were changed for the better by visiting the more enlightened parts of the US. But travel does not, as you say, always broaden the mind. Rupert Murdoch went from Australia to the UK and then to the US, and it has hardly caused an improvement.
I do think the internet helped with horizontal organization of right wing groups that are hard core white supremacists, although certainly right wing media helped consolidate a sort of mainstreaming of right wing views more generally, but not ones that are openly racistā¦ (despite Trumps reluctance to condemn white supremacy) I donāt think that most mainstream right wingers see themselves as actively practicing white supremacy and would reject comparisons to groups like the KKK, various neo-nazi organizations, or people like Varg Vikernes or Anders Brevikā¦ even if do think that Hitler āhad a few good ideasā.
No, not at all. The founder was only part if the John Birch Society.
(My father never allowed us to visit KBF.)
They really are pathetic misfits, and always have beenā¦ being a pathetic misfit doesnāt exactly stop you from being a violent nutjob.
Thereās just something so un-American about aspiring to libertyā¦
Same here. Itās very, very telling. Itās spreading culturally, too. Iām beggining to see SJW and PC cries down here in argentinaās internet holes.
Just about nobody white, I think you mean.
I thought it was a given I was talking about white America in the 1940s. Most of the other animation studios of the time were far worse than what Disney was doing. Have you ever seen the stuff Walter Lanz was doing? Have you ever seen the horrible Scrub me Mama with the Boogie beat?
Hollywood wasnāt all that progressive in the 40s or even the 50s and while the Military let black people in they were not treated all that well.
Yes, there was the start of some progressive moments right after the war but lets not kid ourselves that Disney wasnāt a part of the attitudes of the time.
I would also ask Floyd Norman how Walt felt about black people:
Thanks but even if some animators were even worse, and even if Walt (supposedly) had a racism-absolving āblack friend,ā Iām still not buying the claim that in terms of its output, the company was ahead of the times in terms of race, instead of behind them.
Iād stick close to Donald Duckāheās a battlefield beserker if Iāve ever seen one.
It was the culture of the time they were in, do you not understand that?
Hollywood in the 1940s was miles away from progressive for representation of black people.
The world moved on from there and you have to take those images and films in the context of the time they were made in and not now.
How Disney controls the president:
Better than āHome of the Anaheim Ducks.ā And educational too. Now I have a pretty good idea why Disney started a hockey team in Anaheim of all places.
Free speech means, among other things, that the government canāt stop you from assembling. Alarmingly this was sharply abridged during George Wās presidency and since I donāt have omniscience at this exact moment, Iāll pretend this isnāt actually a relevant point to bring up to you.
Free speech doesnāt mean that others canāt use their speech to contradict you (possibly best described as Dibs Speech because whoever speaks first is true and right forever ā¦ or until they cede their spot in the car).
None of which has anything to do with what happened at this rally.
The government didnāt stop anyone speaking or assembling (they almost never do when itās the KKK or other violent and/or hateful right wingers ā¦ despite frequently doing it to liberals, environmentalists, and other hippie types for whatever reason Iāll also pretend isnāt relevant).
Instead, they enforced the laws against stabbing people with flag poles. And seem to have done a reasonably even job of it.
I feel thatās a sensible and evenhanded compromise from the police. I just wish the āliberalā protestors could get the same deal.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.