What Iād rather do is get several million (or more) residents of the U.S. to laugh and point as they are all escorted out of the White House by the FBI, en route to prison.
I would rather grill Trump on a televised interview - but actually detain him until he directly answers the questions. Keeping him there for as long as it takes without him squirming and weaseling and diverting and deflecting nearly everything. I suspect that it would make him far more uncomfortable than being kicked in the nards
I figured the question as āwhat would give me the most personal satisfaction from these three optionsā, not what the best thing to do is.
So I thought, as Iāve already warmed up, got me steelies on and thereās an unconscious Bannon at my feet, option 2 seemed like a bit of a waste of time when I could donate the cash and save someone from all that tedious press aggro.
Inflicting violence is something I find neither useful nor satisfying, and I think we have enough people trying to pervert the rule of law without framing someone for an act they didnāt commit.
Sāfunny, I felt that was, kindaā¦ dishonest? Like, I got no problem with handing out a smack in the gob, but lying just seemed sort of wrong, somehow.
Option 4: Dragging Bannon and Manafort in front of the Senate, swearing them in, making them answer all sorts of uncomfortable questions about their beliefs, business connections, and campaign shenannigans.
Iād target bannon rather than trump, because out of the two of them I think bannon is more evil, conniving, capable of making the really bad shit happen.
I think with the rape charge the hooker would get the worst of the damage and bannon would turn it around to give him street cred.
For the orange one I would like to set his hair (or pants) on fire on national television.
For natzis I think Iād rather swaddle them in white blankets until they calm down and admit the error of their hate or suffocate, their choice.