No, but you continue to ignore the simple fact that female readers attracted to the superhero genres have always been a minority, at times even vanishingly small. What’s so wrong with that? In Japan the market is clearly segmented and labelled, nobody complains that this or that genre does not attract or represent people not in the targeted segment. Why is it so wrong to admit that American superheroes are de-facto similarly segmented, and respect this fact? There are plenty of more “inclusive” graphic novels in other genres, why is it shameful for superheroes to go another way, if that is the lucrative choice?
You keep projecting and putting words in my mouth. Please tell me where I said it’s problematic, i keep saying it’s how the whole market operates, like any other pop market. “WhiteMaleTeenagexploitation” is not defined in superhero comics simply because it’s default, because it pays better, because it’s what historically drives the market - a fact I accept and that you find somehow horrifying. Whenever other demographics are targeted instead, the trend gets a label. Some of these trends survive and develop, many just die because the demo is not interested. End of.
if the problem is that I’m not supposed to read this, then take it up with BB labelling “why it took so long to make the WW film”, a title that does not really scream gender studies. I simply noted that some of the arguments in the “video” are trite, whether I agree or not. I get it, you love repeating them over and over. I find it boring. Does that make me a monster? That’s not very inclusive of you.