I deny this, much like the phantom menace and Finland, ever happened.
8 Likes
Canāt much stand him, neither.
Casa de mi Padre was okay, though.
Hey, if theyāre still gonna milk the ol Ghostbusters teat dry as if they hadnāt already, why not cast new actors in new roles? Ramis is dead, Murray largely uninterested, and Aykroyd and Hudson couldnāt carry another one on their own. The premise actually supports having new characters, since the titular entity is a company, rather than any specific three-or-four characters. And since the old Ghostbusters were all male (sorry, Annie Potts), why not try something different, if only for the hell of it?
Unless theyāre recasting the role of Peter Venkmann, nobody has to. Was he the only great thing about those movies? Wasnāt it a great setup, well-cast and well-scripted and well-executed all round? Sure, the world doesnāt need a new Ghostbusters, but it really didnāt need the two it got. Weāre just lucky they got made. A third one would be a bonus if itās any good at all, and if it isnāt, itāll just be another wasted opportunity to make a good, funny movie. Thereās nothing intrinsically holding it back except unreasonable expectations, both positive and (mostly) negative.
4 Likes
Recasting an all female cast perpetuates the divide in the sexes as itās clearly a deliberate choice.
Perhaps the Odd Coupleās (female version) apartment could be haunted.
1 Like
That was not the worst of its sins, but youāre right. He was woefully miscast.
Iāll always disagree. Theyāre only roles, open to interpretation by any number of actors, just like Hamlet or Stanley Kowalski or Sherlock Holmes. Hereās an example from my life experience: I worked on the ABC miniseries version of The Shining back in 1996. Less than two weeks before principal photography was scheduled to begin, the actor cast as Jack Torrance backed out. He felt that Jack Nicholsonās performance in the Kubrick movie cast way too long a shadow, that heād forever be compared to that iconic performance and there would be no way he could come out of the experience ahead. Not a wholly unreasonable opinion, to be sure. Nicholsonās performance was utterly iconicā¦ but then again, it was utterly Nicholsonās version of Kubrickās Jack Torrance, and a far cry indeed from the character originally conceived and written by Stephen King. Torrance is supposed to be a deeply flawed alcoholic who loves his family powerfully and desperately wants to be a good husband and father, and yet is slowly driven mad by the malevolent spirits in the Overlook Hotel. Nicholsonās Torrance is nearly maniacal from the outset, and his transformation to homicidal axe-swinger isnāt what youād call particularly subtle or gradual. Steven Weber came aboard the miniseries production and gave, in my opinion, a far more nuanced performance of what King intended that character to be. Weber would be among the first to admit that the Kubrick movie is hugely successful and influential and a towering cinematic achievement, but he was not afraid to step into that role and inhabit it in a way that Nicholson couldnāt even if he triedā¦ simply because Nicholson is Nicholson, and that gets in the way of anything else.
Personally, I thought the Bandit was a more unforgettable, iconic character. But yāknow what I like to imagine? Recasting some of my favorite classic movies that may never get remade, just to see who Iād use if I had the opportunity to remake them. My go-to example is The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly. Certainly this movie doesnāt need to be remade, since itās just as entertaining now as it ever was. But if I had to remake it, Iād try Viggo Mortenson as Blondie and Benicio del Toro as Angel Eyes. And yet I can never quite think of a good, solid Tuco. Any suggestions?
4 Likes
I am too, but Kingdom of the Crystal Skull convinced me that a geriatric Indy movie set in the latter half of the 20th century was an even worse idea. At least a reboot wouldnāt have spoiled my fondness for the original movies, cast and filmmakers.
2 Likes
Melissa McCarthy?
I dunno. A role can always be recast. Otherwise Barry Van Dyke would have had even less of a career than he has. But should it be? What would be the point of remaking TGTBATU? (beyond money)
But like I said before, I atenāt the target audience for this GB film. Kids are. I didnāt see the original at the cinema, but I remember going to see the sequel with my granddad (sister saw BTTF 2 with mum at the same time - I probably chose poorly).
And hell, The Thing is a remake. Doesnāt mean I donāt love it.
2 Likes
Piffle. So if only two or three Busters were women, it would somehow be a more valid choice? Was it sexist to make the original Busters all male? Well sure it was, they only let Annie Potts answer the phones! And yet that movie was apparently so awesome with Murrayās unmatchable performanceā¦?
I do understand where youāre coming from, since yeah, making the lead cast all female unavoidably gives us āThe All-Female New Ghostbusters!!ā but I think weāre addressing different fronts in the battle here. We can bring in just a couple of female comedians like itās no big thing, women are just as funny as men, no need to make a big deal out of it, the gender divide should be so narrow we donāt even see it anymore, etc. etc. Or we can acknowledge that āfemale-centricā casts are not the box office poison that so many studio execs feared them to be for the last ten decades, that audiences of all types will flock to see a genuinely funny movie regardless of which restroom in the honeywagon the stars use (spoiler alert: stars have their own trailers, and never use the honeywagon), and if someone directing the movie thinks itāll be funnier or otherwise more successful with a certain specific cast that happens to be all female, should that director actually reconsider and recast a role or two with males just to make the point that theyāre not tryinā to make any gender point here?
Now if they use a new logo like this, then Iāll readily admit that your concerns are well-founded:
10 Likes
Thatās a good example of a movie, like The Shining, which was remade in a spirit much closer to the source material. Then again, Iāve never heard anyone defending the Christian Nyby version as being ātoo great to remake.ā
1 Like
You mean to sayā¦ it wasnāt accidental? Why would they do that? Much better that comedies be based in reasonable settings, what good would absurd circumstances, false premises, and in your face tactics be in a comedy, anyhow?
1 Like
Well, because itās a good story well-told, and thereās no compelling reason not to. Sure, I get the distinction between theatrical plays and movies. Plays have to get revived and recast because each performance is unique to a specific audience on a specific day, so if more people want to see it, they have to keep performing it, whereas a movie is a more-or-less permanent thing, able to be viewed by audiences yet unborn in essentially the same state that its first audiences saw it. But honestly, no movie is perfect. The best movies contain plenty of flaws and imperfections that are masked by the movieās greatness (or, on some occasions, actually add to that greatness). And yes, I think thereās always room for improvement, even if remakes so rarely succeed as well as Carpenterās The Thing succeeds.
1 Like
If I were going to recast that film, Iād have Charles Bronson as Blondie, Henry Fonda as Angel Eyes and Jason Robards as Tuco.
Damn, I love Once Upon a Time in the West. Even more than I do the Dollars films.
5 Likes
Yes, but it was also representative of the times in which it was made. You cant get all revisionist with stuff that was made in a time when social norms were so different.
I have no problem with women being cast, but I always cringe when I see stuff like this because it entirely disproves the point they were trying to make with the casting (sex aināt no biggie) and reinforces the differences between men & women (of which there are few) rather than similarities (of which there are many).
@AcerPlatanoides I take comedy very seriously ą² _ą²
1 Like
Well, Iām willing to go on record that I much prefer the Nyby version to Carpenterās.
5 Likes
Iām working on the assumption that all Latino Badass roles are offered to Danny Trejo first and heās turned this one down.
Tucoās an interesting character, with something of an on-screen backstory and family. Although thereās no reason why that role should necessarily be Mexican, I think that if the setting and feel of the movie are to be kept in the remake, thereās enough room for some flexibility.
Chow Yun Fat would be fun and as a Chinese migrant labourer, would fit the scene nicely, and a little chop-socky could work well within the movie.
For a different take, how about Halle Berry? Change the background from bandit to ex- or escaped slave and itād be an interesting dynamic between Blondie and Tuco.
And yeah, thereās a reason why Iām not in the movie business. 
3 Likes
Hell, he was a Jewish New Yorker last time.
Iāve thunk on this, and my position is remakes are fine, as long as I didnāt like the original.
4 Likes
Very appropriate pic. Seeing as how both IotBS and Carpenterās The Thing are about people being replaced and thereby losing their humanity. Unfortunately, Carpenterās characters donāt have enough personality to make one really miss their humanity. (I think itās mostly the writing. The actors seem to be doing what they can.) I still think itās quite a good film, but not as great as the original (very different) Nyby/Hawks version.
1 Like
Weirdly enough, as much as I love Kurt Russell, I think he suffers the most in this regard. The movie doesnāt take the time to let us get to know the characters outside of their jobs, and youāre right that the actors are doing what they can with what little the script gives them in the way of backstory and relationships. But I still feel most of them are pretty deftly sketched. I mean, you wonāt go far wrong with Brimley, Moffatt, Dysart, and Masur at your disposal, but we really donāt ever get into Macreadyās head at all. Heās a hard drinker, and apparently learned to fly helicopters during Vietnam, but heās such a social misfit and sullen, withdrawn weirdo that itās difficult to understand why heās there in the first place.
But I like the youthful grooviness of Windows and Nauls, and especially the guilty terror displayed by T.K. Carter after Nauls cuts Macready loose in the blizzard. I like the stick-up-his-ass middle-management style of Moffattās Commander Garry, the back-of-the-school-bus rebellion of Palmer, the quiet, withdrawn misanthropy of Masurās Clark, the arrogance of Bennings, the ambitious competence of Childs, and the is-he-nuts-or-is-he-right breakdown of Blair. Some truly deft performances, sketched without much on the script pages, and I love this movie as much for those performances as for the assured direction, the bone-chilling production design, and Bottinās brilliant viscera.
I have to watch the Nyby one again someday, as itās been too long and I barely remember it.
4 Likes
