That is the thing… it is a gamble here and none of us know if it was the right one or not.
Harris
Buttigieg
2024?
I’d love to see that, but I doubt that’s in the DNC’s plans.
Where is @anon61221983’s puke emoji?
We’re on about the tenth one in the past few years, so no, not really.
But that’s not what I said, is it? You edited my comment. That’s pretty cool. And by cool I mean bullshit. Don’t do that.
Well, it WILL if a bunch of democrats take that to heart and don’t vote…
This topic is temporarily closed for at least 4 hours due to a large number of community flags.
The only downside there is that “beat” has multiple meanings, some of which a Black Democratic candidate really shouldn’t be leaning into.
That’s the thing - it’s a lie. It’s both mathematically and practically, provably wrong.
You’ve made the lie 3 times, now, which makes your whole purpose very sus.
If that was true they wouldn’t be so eager to disenfranchise us though.
My main concern is that Texas will not allow the Democratic nominee on ballot and will successfully use loyalist judges and bribes to tie it up in the courts until 2100 and beyond if possible.
It’s also mathematically and statistically possible to win the lottery- but it ain’t likely. And it’s also not a lie to say the odds are against this electoral map being any different than the several elections before.
And why is it sus to talk about how the system is rigged?
How do six states decide an election without votes from the other 44?
This topic is temporarily closed for at least 4 hours due to a large number of community flags.