Generic 2016 US Election Cycle Recycling Bin

Colour me utterly flabbergasted.

7 Likes
4 Likes

Nixon has a grandson with an undergraduate degree in politics, a law degree, worked in John McCain’s 2008 presidential campaign, and ran for Congress in 2010. Endorsed by Jeb Bush.

But he needs a few months in Congress or as a governor before being seen as qualified to run for the White House. But at least there’s some hope for the GOP in 2020 besides Jeb!.

BTW, does this mean that we can refer to Jeb! now without the exclamation point?

How about - Jeb?!

1 Like

isn’t ¿Jeb? preferable?

2 Likes

[quote=“RogerStrong, post:247, topic:65103, full:true”]BTW, does this mean that we can refer to Jeb! now without the exclamation point?
[/quote]

JebÂż

Nah, insufficient characters.

J¿ 

1 Like

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/religion/pope-to-catholic-leaders-dont-allow-executions-this-year/2016/02/21/1ddbc6c6-d891-11e5-8210-f0bd8de915f6_story.html

The body of Scalia is averaging one revolution per day.

4 Likes

Uh… Eisenhower?

Who would be totally unelectable as he was too liberal for the current frothing at the mouth party.

Who was his veep?

1 Like

Wasn’t my point… my point was that he was a republican elected president and it was after 1928.

Okay, fair enough, technically accurate historical cite. But I seriously doubt that people voted for him because of Nixon. People generally don’t vote for the veep. Nixon also lost in 1960 and he had a bit of scandal while in office as the veep, which is probably partially why he lost in 60. I’d also say he won in 1968, because of the DNC and their inability to bring together all the wings of their party. The democrats backed the war, officially, and the youth revolted against that, went with McGovern, and they got trounced because the adult democrats felt that he didn’t represent their views on the war… plus, Nixon ran on a “secret plan” to get us out of vietnam, and he struck a law and order tone (plus, the dreaded southern strategy).

The best kind of accurate!

It’s a silly statistic but it amuses me. Nixon was on 5 tickets, Bush 41 on 4, Bush 43 on 2. That’s about half the elections in that time, and they won most of them.

I guess Jeb! could still be a VP (although he won’t).

That was '72, wasn’t it? Nixon beat Humphrey in '68.

Didn’t the Democrats also want Ike to be their candidate?

1 Like

Yes! Wallace, however, did run to the racist right of Nixon and split the vote, but Humphrey couldn’t get traction because of the youth vote.

How about I shut up, since clearly, presidential history is not my field! :wink:

Eisenhower’s VP was Nixon.

The quote should be “The last time GOP won without a Bush or Nixon on the ticket was 1928.”

(Of course, Trump could still pick Jeb! as his VP candidate.)

2 Likes

wow.

6 Likes

Giuliani for Trump’s Veep?

1 Like

So while Clinton gets the war criminal endorsements, Rubio is busy getting the terrorist funding / sympathizer ones.

2 Likes

Two New Yorkers on the ticket, I think that would be a first. It’s too bad Giuliani wasn’t in this race, his run for '08 was one of my favorite campaigns.

2 Likes