Invasion boards set out to ruin lives

boing
63

10 Likes
64

Welcome to the internet; is it new in your area?

5 Likes
65

Points:

  • Lack of due diligence
  • Guilt by association
  • Misrepresentation of large groups
  • Enabling of professional trolls
  • Ignoring inconvenient facts
  • Non-sequitur
  • Denying all of the above

Not points:

  • Ad hominem
  • Mediocre Magritte edits
  • Plugging your ears
  • Quote + laughter

Such a welcoming community.

2 Likes
66

Your ability to get words in the wrong order is truly remarkable, single purpose attack account.

How is the view from down that rabbit hole? Sounds horrifyingly sad from here. Perhaps you’re mistaking that for anger on my part? I just want you to help yourself, or go away. i have no idea what good working a vendatta against a stranger among third parties who have not a fuck to give, will net you?

But tilt on, noble paladin. You might be exactly correct. Still, I am not seeing the point, even if you are.

5 Likes
67

You didn’t even try.

68

Known for giving better than we get. Softballs appreciated muchly!

2 Likes
69

I learned it from watching you

5 Likes
70
71

12 Likes
72

Did you intend to make a list of Gamergate’s tactics under your “points”, or was that a happy accident? Very Rove-ian to accuse your enemies of what you yourself are doing.

6 Likes
73

Dude could get a job at a movie theatre with projection like that!

5 Likes
74

George & Jerry

2 Likes
75

I resent the implication that I am a Yankees fan.

4 Likes
76

The first rule of GAME CLUB is

Be cool. Don’t post insulting, bullying, victim-blaming, racist, sexist, or homophobic remarks.

In your inaugural post, you broke that rule at least three times to three different targets.

I’d say the reception so far is pretty lighthearted, but that’s probably a reflection on the fact that you’ve not yet given anyone a reason to take you seriously.

11 Likes
77

700.jpg700×490 126 KB

source

2 Likes
78

You missed the “if”, didn’t you. And as for the rest,

Seriously…nope.

79

If you posted an ad hominem attack disguised as a rhetorical question that’s one thing. But if you’re not even aware that you did so, it’s another. And that you can’t even articulate your rhetorical argument is the third half.

1 Like
80

Not to mention that if @PrestonSturges were to try and generate a SWAT against themselves by giving an antagonizer some piece of false information that implicates @PrestonSturges in crimes that ordinarily, if real, a SWAT response might be appropriate, then just who would @PrestonSturges sue, and how?

Gosh knows the popo won’t care about damaging the home, shooting the occupants or otherwise running amuck if they can point at anything, false or otherwise, that @PrestonSturges posted themselves, that the popo could call actionable, even if just in case actionable. Anyone reporting possible infractions of the nature jokingly suggested would be commended, or at least not chastised, for calling it in.

Kind of a dumb plan all the way round.

2 Likes
81

1 Like
82

Oh, we’re just aping 4chan, I suppose…

Oh, noes! I just meant to reply at @looniem… Sorry @PrestonSturges

2 Likes