I was wondering about whether the college kids at Mizzou vote, but then I remembered that my older sister went there and she voted with an absentee ballot from CA.
Sigh. Very sorry.
I was wondering about whether the college kids at Mizzou vote, but then I remembered that my older sister went there and she voted with an absentee ballot from CA.
Sigh. Very sorry.
WTF? Shut the fuck up, Karen. It’s not transgressing your “religious liberty” if people who aren’t of your religious views have freedom too, ffs…
If Fox News were smart and wanted to start winning elections again, they would give him a commentator job and keep his dad off the air
It would be very bad if that legal theory gets traction. It sounds like a roadmap to christian fascism
As the journalist points out, the reason they felt it was important to go to this one was because of a similar ‘conservative’ law conference in 1982 that gave birth to the Federalist Society, attended by both Scalia and Bork.
There are real dangers here, not merely theoretical arguments.
As it is meant to be. This is how we get to Gilead. And they are very open about it.
I was wrong about the kid. Turns out he was driving trollies the alties.
(If you somehow stumbled across this post I’d like to apologize to you)
Rule of goats… he’s still spreading qanon antisemitic conspiracy theories… I wish 15 year old edgelords would shut the fuck up and stop acting like they have shit figured out. They are making the world a WORSE place with their “pranks”… FFS.
ETA: Also, the kid looks like a young Ian Svenonious…
Only “edgier”…
I didn’t mean to imply otherwise. That is terrifying
I think this is a good piece by Amanda Marcotte:
Yes, and:
The cornerstone of Vermeule’s theory is the claim that “the central aim of the constitutional order is to promote good rule, not to ‘protect liberty’ as an end in itself”
As a Canadian, home of “Peace, Order, and Good Government”, that sounds okay.
In practice, Vermeule’s theory lends support to an idiosyncratic but far-reaching set of far-right objectives: outright bans on abortion and same-sex marriage, sweeping limits on freedom of expression and expanded authorities for the government to do everything from protecting the natural environment to prohibiting the sale of porn.
What? No! Wrong!
They couldn’t find it in the constitution, so they looked to the founders, now they’re going to pull it out of thin air based on “because we say so”.
what utterly craven assholes at Fox. kidnapping and stealing from your own mother??!!
disgusting trash people. no fucking excuse.
may her karma be swift and infallible.
This turn of phrase resonates with me
right-wing culture warriors do not draw fine distinctions between misogyny, homophobia and transphobia. It’s one big rat king of gender insecurity and fury for them, one that drag especially aggravates.
Aren’t these the same people who “don’t co-parent with the government?” If it’s not their kids at the shows, then how is it any of their fucking business?