On the one hand, I generally think that the sex lives of other consenting adults are none of my business and that the Daily Mail is indeed a garbage publication.
On the other hand, this woman is one of the most monstrous individuals in our society so I’m not going to shed any tears if a trashy tabloid exposes her sordid, hypocritical personal life.
this rumor, while deriving its power from policing women and sexuality, accidentally (or, likely, on purpose) makes Empty Greene sound much cooler than she actually is.
Any mention of a tantric sex guru brings this story to mind:
No wonder Greene believes in lizard people, she might be having an affair with one!
Yeah, Carla, I agree with the other folks here, this honestly, the least interesting, least scandalous piece of information about Marjorie Taylor Greene to come out so far. Additionally, the Daily Mail is a piece of anti-feminist trash, as Amanda Palmer to beautifully demonstrated:
Seeing them post this is like watching one dumpster trying to catch a neighboring dumpster on fire, when they are both already burning…
It’s not about the sex (go, Greene!), it’s about the hypocrisy (on-brand Greene).
This congress critter is a horrible person and has done plenty of awful things, but slut shaming is not an act I’m going to celebrate. I do not know the vows she made to her husband nor am I privy to any updates to those vows. This concept of calling out women who are “cheating” when we don’t even know whether that’s true is disgusting.
UK libel laws make it pretty easy to collect on suits like this unless the publisher is pretty iron-clad in their sourcing…
But Greene and Lin Wood aren’t suing…
Whilst the daily mail doesnt have much of a reputation to uphold, on this i’d take their side over hers due to the magnitude of the crazy…
While I would be completely unsurprised if this garbage person acted in this hypocritical way, I’m going to wait on a better source for the story than the Daily Heil. I do wish more people took this quote from Justin Tway to heart, though:
‘I have no interest in talking about anything to do with that woman. Everything with her comes to no good.’
‘intended to smear her with false accusations, half-truths, misrepresentations, out-of-context statements, and agenda driven lies.’
A half-truth here, an out-of-context statement there, pretty soon you’re talking real money.
“… because I’m the biggest threat to the Democrats’ Socialist agenda”
That’s the funniest thing I’ve read today.
"Taylor Greene called the story ‘ridiculous tabloid garbage spread by an avowed Communist,’ and ‘another attempt to smear my name because I’m the biggest threat to the Democrats’ Socialist agenda.
So she takes the opportunity to smear unnamed Democrats at the same time that she complains about being unfairly smeared? Perfect!
I hope that this is categorically not true, but that she finds absolutely no way to stop its spread, and it affects her adversely. That seems fair.
No, it’s trot out the thing people are MOST likely to have a negative visceral reaction to.
Yes, she’s a walking horror show. That SHOULD stand of it’s own, but there isn’t enough negative reaction. Let’s see what we can get by bringing sex into the mix.
We’re using Daily Mail as a source of news now?
Point of clarification here: Does tantric sex count as cheating?
Asking for a friend, obviously.
Her attorney L. Lin Wood, has previously said that an article about the allegations published by the New Yorker magazine was ‘intended to smear her with false accusations, half-truths, misrepresentations, out-of-context statements, and agenda driven lies.’
I looked for that one, but no luck.
Only if your SO doesn’t know about it.