Their method of reading the US Constitution seems to be identical to their method of reading the Bible. One or two sections almost illegible from the finger running over it over and over again, the rest pristine and unregarded.
Being keen on the 2nd Amendment and ignoring the Establishment Clause seems to be on the same level as calling for the elimination of gay people and witches while eating a ham and cheese sandwich and wearing a poly-cotton tshirt over a tattoo of Jesus and a quote from Leviticus.
‘Mixed’ isn’t the term I would use; but why are she & Empty G so hellbent on trying to out-stupid Louie Gohmert?
No, she didn’t & those aren’t ‘christians’.
She told those Talibanners exactly what they wanted to hear & believe, facts be damned.
‘The’ church? Which one?
In any case, maybe she could be sent on a fact-finding mission to some American-hating Theocracy to see how things work. Once she swims back, she can enlighten us with her new-found wisdom.
I doubt she knows about it; nor would she care about it if she did.
Yet another idiot that gets it exactly bass-ackwards and is unaware of the 9th Amendment.
She’s in evil company with some members of the SCOTUS.
She said she’s going to see how the primary goes and then they may buy the building.
I wonder what that means. If she loses the election and has campaign money left over maybe she’ll use that to buy the building. These people that claim democrats leave office with more money always seem to do just fine when they leave office and even in office.
In their mind the exact law being prescribed is just a tool in the chest, an option on the table, which they expect to be wielded fairly and judiciously. Surely no one would do anything so unreasonable as actually enforcing it as written! Not when that would be bad!
I’m not so sure of this Shirley Exception. Some (or many) “moderate” conservatives want it to be that bad. Eg, when the “caravans” arrived at the southern border, many conservatives were pleased at the obvious cruelty and indignity inflicted upon detainees.
Right, but they would be outraged if the same were inflicted upon them and theirs. Because, surely, they would be an exception to any such laws, which were meant for “those other people”, after all.
“He’s not hurting the people he needs to be hurting.”
– Trump voter Crystal Minton