That sounds impractically absolute.
But how do you know that this guy has been exemplary in his work up to this point? He may well have been skirting dismissal in a variety of ways for a while, but there was never a clear-cut reason to reward him with unemployment compensation.
In relationships, whether personal or professional, outsiders only see the tip of the iceberg.
There is nothing they could possibly do, legally, that would change your opinion?
What if they painted their truck (assuming this is a sound analogy, as I also manage contractors) with a huge ISIS flag and park it on your site?
Would you not respons to the more than likely concerns of YOUR customers?
Please do not compare who someone is passively (of latin origin) with what they say and do (racist tirades). Itâs super weaksauce and existentially inauthentic.
Free speech has never meant consequence free speech, ever. Can there be overreaction to something someone says off-handedly? Most certainly, and we as a society have to try to keep that in check. The mob can, and often is wrong, but itâs something humans always do. Legislating against it would itself be an actual imposition upon free speech. But if one presumes language can have a positive impact, then it necessarily can have a negative one as well. This guy didnât make some off-handed comment though, he engaged in a direct verbal attack designed to do harm to the target of his tirade. Whatever grey area exists between overreaction and appropriate sanction, this guy is a long way from the hazy area.
The idea that I should be concerned that racists are forced to self-censor and not call black people n*****s and monkeys to their face is not one I can find a way to entertain. Unless I am supremely odd, I have to assume that we all think some fairly dumb and hurtful things, and rationally self-censor them because we do not intend harm to another person, or are potentially just afraid of the riposte, whether verbal or physical. Some thoughts really do deserve to be censored inside oneâs head and not shared with the world, where they inevitably just make it a worse place.
To defend the privacy of your home and the pseudonymity of your avatars, you may like to provide some long-range artillery support to the people shelled at the perimeter. If they lose their ground, the battle front will move to your windows.
If you donât like them, donât make them win, fine with me - but if you like what you still got, you should also not let them lose.
Well, those would probably be the among the opening remarks from lawyers representing employees suing you for workplace discrimination and a hostile work environment, because you knew of this employeeâs behavior and did nothing about it, so the employees felt you either shared/condoned those views or gave them tacit approval. You might also get a lot of dropped business and have a hard time attracting new clients who donât like racial slurs. I imagine people would also respond on social media with boycotts, so youâd probably need to bring in a savvy PR team to handle that mess, and their first recommendation would be for you to fire the racist asshole.
Or, you could save your company a lot of embarrassment, legal and PR fees, client relationships, money, and generate some goodwill by demonstrating the importance ofâand your commitment toâinclusion, diversity, and equality, by immediately firing the racist asshole.
Mr. Pisone is now free to start his own landscaping company and Iâm looking forward to his attempts at attracting new clients.
Is it really amazing that unpopular speech makes you⌠unpopular?
Really?
Your hypothetical doesnât apply to my work. I work in silicon valley managing an engineering team in three countries. We donât have trucks or sites.
I believe that this guy had every right to use his freedom of speech in the manner he did.
I also believe that his employer has every right to use their freedom of association to not be associated with someone who behaves this way.
Hey, John Pisone: Get a job, you fucking racist parasite.
Except no one is asking you too. Youâre focusing on the one instance and not on the implications as a general case. I think you know that too, which makes it a cheap debate trick here.
I donât work in a business that âattracts clients.â
Seems like an asshole thought police move. It isnât my business if an employee is a racist unless it becomes an issue at work.
I also manage engineers, their trucks contain things like radars and drills and chemistry labs. Theyâre professionals.
Who they are while not at work isnât my business unless and until they make a client feel threatened.
What do you do when someone who works for you plausibly causes someone else to feel fear and discomfort? How do you handle that? Do you explain to your customers that they are wrong to feel that way.
If so, how does might invalidating clients work out for you?
No, itâs not.
This man is not meeting the minimum threshold to be considered a civilized adult by any measure other than the technicality of being old. No person who isnât awful behaves that way, and we shouldnât be supporting that technicality and trying to conflate it with other fully legitimate adult behaviors that deserve to be respected. Otherwise we have a race to the bottom and people treating this bullshit behavior like itâs appropriate.
That is in no way comparable to protesting to help others or even doing wacky-but-harmless things on your own time.
No I am not.
[quote=âparalipsis, post:85, topic:71400â]
Whatever grey area exists between overreaction and appropriate sanction, this guy is a long way from the hazy area.[/quote][quote=âparalipsis, post:85, topic:71400â]
Can there be overreaction to something someone says off-handedly? Most certainly, and we as a society have to try to keep that in check.[/quote]
My point is that free speech absolutism is just as dumb as overt controls over what we can and canât say.
Speech can be a weapon. It can do harm. The idea that such harm can never be without consequence is impractical in the extreme. I hold this guy up as a shining example of someone way past wherever the boundary is that needs to be debated, not as a generalisation.
I donât have customers. I have an employer.
If there are complaints about an employee that I manage, I talk to them, possibly with our HR rep in the room if it seems warranted. Thatâs why we have HR. Thatâs assuming it is a workplace complaint.
If it is a complaint outside of work by a non-employee about behavior on their own time, if it isnât illegal in a way the company cares about, I doubt it is my issue.
In the situation weâre discussing, and in the question I asked, they/you do.
Actually, it is. In this case, Mr. Pisone acted in a way that brought his racism to his workplace, so his racism became a workplace issue.
I was asked what I would do as a manager. I said what I would do. I donât work in landscaping and donât do deal in hypotheticals of doing so.
I do mange six people and a contractor so I can say howâd Iâd react as a manager, which is that it isnât my fucking business unless there is a workplace complaint. I donât know what my folks do outside of work, mostly, and I donât need to know. What they do at work with coworkers is my business.
I certainly donât post here under my real nameâŚ