Not surprised.
Aaaaand that’s where you’re wrong. Or have you recently fallen to Earth from another planet and are not familiar with contemporary culture? In which case, let me congratulate you on your excellent command of the idiom, despite your complete and utter inability to make blindingly-obvious logical inferences from a wealth of data.
They still refer to the Exeter Chiefs in their rugby union reports.
In rugby league, Barrow Raiders at least had the good sense to change their name from Barrow Braves when they merged with Carlisle Border Raiders
It’s a mystery! Who could predict! No available evidence from which to draw a conclusion. The jury is out. A stumper!
Do you need medical assistance?
Reply 17 times for “yes”, use the word context correctly for “no”.
If he were playing dumb, he would be mute and unresponsive, so that’s right out.
I forgot about the Chiefs! They’re a fairly new team, too. Or at least the Chiefs bit is.
I don’t defend corporations that lie, I defend against censorship - but you go ahead and put words in my mouth.
“Were they out of red facepaint for you to really commit to your racism? Also, aren’t you cold? And where are your shoes? What tribe, exactly are you mocking here? It’s tough to tell with that period leatherette and polyester fringe.”
I’ll let your srawman answer that.
LOL! Was there a question there?
Unfortunately yes, perhaps worse outside urban areas and upper middle class enclaves, sometimes even on university campuses. It is still a problem both in personal interaction and in workplaces and for some economic privilege allows them to surround themselves with tolerant people, but it can be unfriendly for those outside the affluence bubble.
I think this thread has completely jumped the shark. I am “a corporatist”? I “care nothing for any … appreciation of science”? Etc. etc.
OK, I’m done. You want to have a discussion with your little strawman, go ahead. I’m not participating with your weird charade. Have fun.
Wow, that’s a crazy cocktail. Being a proud defender of racism obviously makes one a rugged individualist.
You must be using a different version of “systematically oppressed” than the rest of the world.
Sorry, I’ll stop objecting to censorship if you want. I’d hate to upset you.
Don’t censor my censorship!! I hate double plus good censorship!!
(Did I just jump the jumping shark?)
In a court of law, it can be very, very difficult to determine your “bright, clear line”.
You understand literally noone else in the world are gonna get these jokes except for us, right? But I still believe in climate change as long as you accept other models.
