Cut to gun-porn ignoramus lovingly cleaning out his assault rifle, one of ten, and listening to HW: “He’s right, you know.”
Is that a Liquor Cabinet position?
Well, statistically
No onebox, but the key is 87% to 99%. Really really high.
Why does It sounds like a quote from “Zoolander”?
8 posts were split to a new topic: Are mass murderers just misunderstood, or misdiagnosed?
And who will watch the watchers that’s looking at young men that’s looking at women that’s looking at social media?
OK, I hate being the one to point this out, and I’d vote for Warnock in a heartbeat if I lived in Georgia, but I’m pretty sure what Walker actually says here is “a department that can look at young men that’s looking – or women! – that’s looking at social media”
It’s still a dumbass thing to say, but marginally more coherent.
Imma go with: “Did you drive to work, or bring your lunch?!!”
Otherwise, totes upvote…
Can we NOT flip this script? “GOP Politicizing Gun Violence by Legislatively Allowing it to Continue Ad Nauseum!!!”
That doesn’t change the facts, that Walker should not be running for office.
Stop making excuses for the GOP.
4 posts were merged into an existing topic: Are mass-murderers just misunderstood, or misdiagnosed?
We don’t even need to rescind the 2nd Amendment. We just need to do the same thing that other countries with heavy gun ownership do (like Switzerland and Israel). We don’t even do the bare minimum. The ATF is restricted by law from computerizing certain records, to make it less efficient at its job.
Worst cover version of ‘Music to Watch Girls By’, ever.
Proud graduate of Drumpf U.
Hell, it doesn’t even require qualification, it’s baked right in but SCOTUS just decided to completely ignore it:
A well-regulated militia…
I mean, what’s unclear about that? I know all of these Punisher cosplayers love to call themselves militia, but in the context of the Constitution it’s pretty damn clear what was meant, especially with the “well regulated” part.
aside from his apparent inability to give a coherent answer in an interview, he has also made a lot of statements that are provably untrue. he also has been alleged to be abusive to women. he also has expounded on theories on which he has done absolutely no research. but he has a famous name. and powerful, rich people want to capitalize on that name to have a puppet in office…hmmmm, which candidate are we talking about here?
Imagine if they did look at social media, especially the hives of scum and villainy.