I doubt it. People who purge regularly generally do not have grills like this:
It’s worth noting that your body can only store so many calories as adipose cells in a given time frame. A meal like that will max it out, and the rest will get, um, processed. You’d have to eat like that regularly to balloon up. An occasional meal like that, while it will temporarily skyrocket your cholesterol, isn’t going to result in obesity. BMI is about habits, not the last meal you ate. America’s obesity epidemic isn’t a result of having rich high-calorie food. It’s a consequence of eating junk food multiple times every day combined with inactive lifestyles.
I personally don’t see how this is any more (or even as) “being on top” than a connaisseur who indulges in a $100 plate of two 3oz pork medallions at a trendy restaurant or a fifty dollar glass of wine. World hunger doesn’t exist because of a shortage of calories, but due to economic inequality and a failure to distribute what’s produced. It seems sort of superficial to look down on someone because they do something that the lack of which wouldn’t impact world hunger one bit. It just means the restaurant throws away less perfectly good food the next morning. If it’s the conspicuous consumption people object to, where are those concerned citizens when someone’s unboxing their perfectly useless Apple Watch or new handbag on YouTube?
Just a friendly contrarian view.
