Of course it is no mystery that Boing Boing has a very strong Anti-Trump bias. I'm not here to even debate that position. That being said, the question I do have is whether or not Boing Boing has a responsibility to be a credible source of information regarding Trump. I am worried that any news that appears to be Anti-Trump will be taken at face value and printed without any investigation into it's legitimacy. This is not solving the Trump problem because it comes from a place of being deceptive and will lower Boing Boing's credibility. If so then it must be recognized that for better or for worse that Boing Boing's position is to release any information, true or not that de-legitimizes Trump's presidency.
Of course I understand the difference between opinion and fact based information. However, when there is a persuasion bias in effect that leans toward an opinion based agenda that is not based in truth, that agenda will corrupt the institution it represents and will lower its credibility and intrinsic value of that institution. Or of course I could be completely wrong in how I am perceiving what is going on. I am also very open to listening to other perspectives that could help me understand Boing Boing's position on publishing anything that appears to be Anti- Trump regardless of knowing it's legitimacy and why that is seen as the moral high ground.