Okay, here's three.
First, blaming the leak (heh) on the CIA. He himself says that this mess of claims was the worst-kept secret in Washington, and has been circulating for weeks.
Second, conflating endorsements by former CIA people with the position of the CIA. Yes, it is quite an old boys network, and that argument could have been made, but he didn't and skipped on ahead as if it was an established fact.
Third, after setting up his "Deep State overlords" strawman, he mocks them for basing their resistance to Trump on such weak stuff. If we accept the "Deep State overlords", then we have no idea of what their presumed resistance is based on, but it probably wouldn't be on a paid political mess like that. Again, he slides another speculation step into place and climbs it to build his conclusion.
Solutions to Trump? How about a post that causes him to pop a vein while tweeting at 5am on the john? But that's just my aimless jelly fish talking..