No. Sharia law was outlawed five years ago,.
Jeez.
Thatâs not what the rest of us came here for actually.
As with the âmuzziesâ, others are carrying the burden of your imaginings about them.
I thank you for the opportunity to showcase some gifs. Good luck with that falling sky
Trifling trifler is trifling.
Yeah you did. Thats how the dialectic works. âŚ
Ah, breath of fresh intellectual air.
Is this the video of dancing brown people that you saw?
Do you suppose that guy has any cognitive dissonance over the conjunction of his Murika flag worship and a weapon designed by a three-time recipient of the Order of Lenin?
This issue keeps reminding me of the video footage from âThe Laughing Man Incidentâ in the first season of the Ghost in the Shell anime series.
Basically, by the time the case heated back up again, itâd been years, and nobody had a copy of the original footage of the incident. Constant overlays in the video that donât match between copies, no clean version, the earliest known copy was significantly after the fact. And in that universe brain-computer interfaces had advanced so far that there wasnât really any way to distinguish something you misremembered from something on your personal non-volatile hard drive from something you found out on the internet.
I can see parallels in this case, except that we still do have original copies. Yet people are choosing to believe a fabrication for reasons likely related to keeping their mental narratives intact.
No, but history shows rules like that are going to be disproportionately not enforced on rich white people, primarily against people who have conditions that donât in fact affect their ability to do the job but are going to be prevented from it anyone. Mostly the ones who donât have Republican Presidential Candidate Level buy-your-way-out-of-anything money.
Donât call him a skeptic. The hallmarks of skepticism are above all: following the evidence and changing oneâs mind with new information.
Our friend Alistair here is a denialist.
Whatâs dissonant on choosing the best? Said Order was awarded for a reason.
That sounds like the adviser doing too little, in Trumps case. They ought to do something with sky writing, and have the window washers in his large black and gold buildings holding up signage, and displaying billboards, and taking over his private jetâs intercom and, and, and, thereâs so much such an adviser could do in Trumpâs case and still be doing far too little.
Have the grounds keeper at the golf course mow âTRUMP IS ALWAYS FULL OF SHITâ into all the courses.
Like a father who is African, or a Muslim upbringing, for example. But then even proof isnât proof.
Lets recall it was Trump that kept the Birth Certificate flap going like a fart in an elevator for YEARS.
it was HUUUUGE to him. 'UUUUUUUGE
I was just talking mental conditions, but that too.
I would not put it past the politicians (particularly on the conservative side) to use a rival candidates not-even-a-real-obstacle mental difference, like, say, autism or a mood disorder currently under control with medication to their advantage. As an autistic person that fact pisses me off.
When people who havenât actually experienced any mental illness or developmental disorder get to make the rules over whatâs an âacceptableâ level of disabilityâŚbad things tend to happen.
I totally conflated the two intentionally. Thank you for playing along with that.
I look forward to the days when theyâre bigoted about mood issues, instead of vaginas and skin color.
This shit is a game of inches. But weâre winning.
Oh! Lookit that really cool dog! Huh? My homework? Didnât do it. Thereâs a really cool dog out there, you know?
Um, you might want to review your argument that I asked for a citation for. You said:
âYou obviously havenât read or watched videos from Britain or other European countries where radical islamic groups are openly relishing the thought that as muslim populations grow so will the democratic emergence of Sharia law that will usurp the governments of these countries.â
If you want to find someone whoâs arguing both sides of the argument, go check out one of these.
Yeah but weâre talking about applying standards to a specific rich white man, not instituting a general mental competence qualification that would be wielded unevenly like a voting literacy test or poll tax.