Obviously. The etymology of disgust means distaste. So one can only reasonably interpret disgust to apply to situations where one might eat a substance.
So when someone says Trump disgusts them I always assume a much closer association with him than the norm.
It’s incredibly obvious, isn’t it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That’s the way your hard-core Commie works.
Women sense my power and they seek the life essence. I do not avoid women, but I do deny them my essence until I purify it in the airport soap dispensers.
I think a great many people will jump to the conclusion that it’s bodily fluid specific to males, but unless you work in a fertility clinic, where are you going to get a quart of that?
More gross details:
(I remember seeing a clip of Abbie Hoffman recounting “the Great Circle Jerk of '51”, when he and his childhood friends were hanging out in their clubhouse, and thought they could fill up a quart milk bottle as some kind of prank, only to discover the painful reality that it takes forever to fill up a quart bottle a spoonful at a time. Which in turn reminds of the ever-popular “Elton-John-got-his-stomach-pumped” myth, since applied to Rod Stewart, Courtney Love, and Lil’ Kim.)
What does it mean that it was “nothing sinister?”
Is it the bodily fluid that is not sinister, and yet disgusting, or is it the act of putting the disgusting bodily fluid in the soap dispenser that is not sinister?
They should probably test it? If only for diseases? Presumably somebody discovered the fluid by getting it on their hands. Perhaps that person needs to be tested for hepatitis now, or any number of diseases transmitted via bodily fluids.
Actually it doesn’t specify that is human bodily fluid. And I think is possible to buy “large” quantities of non human bodily fluids, as they have their “applications”.
Somehow this reduces the disgusting factor and also a little the health risk
I melted down 2000 bodies, placed the resulting fluid in the soap dispensers, and then forgot to change them for a year. I’m sorry, mistakes were made ok.
That’s a bit doctrinaire, innit? It’s a pretty shit-hot rule of thumb that says folks find non-consensual contact with random spooge etc disgusting - I’m tipping it’s better than 9999/10000.
That I can appreciate, but the title and story frame it that the fluid itself is disgusting. I would find it surprisingly (hypocritically?) woke for airport security of all people to suddenly be approaching news from a consent-based perspective. Although technically, I suppose dispensers in public don’t usually say what one should expect them to dispense, they probably should.