No, they mean it literally: impact, as from a cannon ball.
The East India Company was really good at cultural impact in that sense.
No, they mean it literally: impact, as from a cannon ball.
The East India Company was really good at cultural impact in that sense.
What good is a flat basketball?
A lead frisbeeā¦
From the article:
But as a conservative who has long been skeptical of big government, I am coming to believe that confronting the rise of the Technocrats may necessitate a Theodore Roosevelt-like figurehead to rein in this threatāthat may very well eclipse the threat of big government
Uhm, congratulations? You finally got to a point the rest of us realised decades ago?
1600 millionaires. Or they could crack down on 1.6 billionaires.
(Iām aware my math may not hold up to rigorous scrutiny, but I think Iām right in principle.)
Maybe 160?
As long as they go after the billionaires!
Or crack down on one and cra down on another.
Republicans like to pretend they are the party of āfiscal conservatismā but if you really want to be able to pay for the things the government does you need a strong, well-funded IRS to bring in the money.
Hope the Feds drop in on these guys like itās āGoodfellas.ā
Right. It might take a lot more effort, but the results would be not only greater tax revenue, but a weakening of the billionairesā political power.
Ah, I see where your misunderstanding lies.
They donāt want to pay, and they donāt want the government to do things. I mean, except for themselves and a select group of peers.
Spending more money on targeting rich tax dodgers would be a very efficient use of money- I posted this in another thread recently:
Somethingā¦ somethingā¦pure hubris.
I mean, itās nice of the palaeontologists to be concerned on behalf of the palaeoanthropologists whose discipline is actually the relevant one here, I suppose
Because a palaeontologist has to work with the same group to understand why this is problematic? Palaeoanthropology is a branch of palaeontology (and anthropology).
Not where I come from, but maybe other countries have other institutional divisions.
(Americans think archaeology is a part of anthropology, but that is a rant for another day)
Well, not all Americansā¦