Thatâs awful. Especially the erasure of the Kurdish victimsâŚ
Yes, let them set the agenda. Thereâs no way that will go wrong. /s
They are thinking the death toll could get up to 20,000 people in the earthquake in Turkiye, Syria, and KurdistanâŚ
AndâŚ
⌠why, I feel more enthusiastic about voting for Democrats alreadyâimagine if they keep that up
Weâre gonna need bigger thumbs.
that is truly grim.
itâs also horrible to think that so many of those people are dead because the buildings have almost no regulation at all. the world will (hopefully) pour money into the recovery, but if the money had been there before hand: so many lives would have been saved
like climate change: a completely foreseeable, human made catastrophe
American racists seem much more inclusive then European racists. Then again from a racists view almost all of them are mixed race.
Ah yes, the evil place
It sounds almost like you are suggesting prevention is cheaper than recovery, but that canât be right. Whereâs the profit? (/s)
long-term thinking =/= short-term profit
Well yeah, not many parents keep their kids from eating chocolate.
I had a notice on my kids med chart thingy that she needed a lead screening at her next wellness exam. But when my spouse asked, pediatrician said she didnât need it because we donât consume a lot of candies from less developed countries and didnât live in an older home.
It bothered me. Lead screening seems very basic and should be done as a matter of course. Even more so now that we know of previously hidden avenues of exposure
If lead screening was routine on all kids, maybe situations like the Flint water crisis would have been noticed sooner by someone who would do something about it
Edited to change pronouns so itâs clear the doc said we didnât need to test
Hmm. Why not do it? Is it an invasive test or something?
I donât know. wasnât the parent on duty that day. Maybe because itâs a blood draw and she hates needles. Even just a prick test would freak her out.
Itâs likely my spouse did question it but just didnât remember when I asked a few weeks later.
ETA: might also be that the insurance wouldnât cover the test without evidence of risk factors. Which is both short sighted and par for the course