No matter what you may think, the study of Informal Logic and fallacies calls this a Slippery Slope Fallacy, and shows it as a poor basis for reasoning by attempting to second–guess the law of probabilities.
Besides, I don’t think blowjobs in the street are all that rare.
Exactly how I’d handle it until the kid is old enough. 10 years old, they should know what sex is and explaining “well dear, some people like to lick other people’s buttholes while having sex. It’s not for everyone and certainly only for consenting adults. This dude must really love to do that. Pretty silly to put it in your truck” isn’t that big a deal
Or “that is a reference to a sex act and he probably put it on his truck to be egdey or offensive.” Then field follow up questions as appropriate.
Or try the great get-out-of-sticky-explaination card “I don’t know sweetie, what do you think it means?”
Mine’s a second grader, and can be pretty blunt/honest as I suspect most children. I’d just explain it literally. “Well, this guy is advertising to the world that he likes to lick butts…”. Which, I’m sure would result in a roar of “gross! Eew!”. After which a simple “yeah, kind of weird for him to have a sticker on his truck about that…”. Probably end of conversation right there.
No. Accepting that kids don’t need to understand everything yet.
My 4 year old would interpret that sentence as a poop joke and think it hilarious. And then probably re-tell it to my mother in law, which again would be hilarious for different reasons.
Children don’t get traumatized by this kind of stuff, and they don’t ‘loose their innocence’. The innocence of kids is quite resilient.
"Having evaluated the evidence through the prism of Supreme Court precedent it is determined the Defendant has a valid defense to be raised under the First Amendment of our United States Constitution.“ - Assistant State Attorney John Foster Durrett
You don’t say?
Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with freedom of speech. The Court overturned a conviction against Paul Robert Cohen for the crime of disturbing the peace by wearing a jacket displaying " Fuck the Draft " in the public corridors of a California courthouse .